WEBVTT

00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:03.060
So we're excited to have you all join us today.

00:00:03.520 --> 00:00:04.820
You're in the right spot.

00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:13.600
Today's webinar topic is integrating a Catholic Christian meta model of the person, and we have loads of information that we're excited to share with you all.

00:00:13.600 --> 00:00:15.425
So stay tight.

00:00:23.805 --> 00:00:24.285
Alright.

00:00:24.285 --> 00:00:27.985
I have, our presenters and speakers today.

00:00:33.200 --> 00:00:34.660
For the next slide, please.

00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:37.460
Alrighty.

00:00:38.080 --> 00:00:45.460
So here we have, Paul c Vitts, doctor Craig Stephen Titus, and doctor William j Nordland.

00:00:46.235 --> 00:00:54.975
Just to give you a sense of who these professors and now editors of a newly published book are, I'm gonna go through their bios.

00:00:55.435 --> 00:00:56.315
Doctor Paul C.

00:00:56.315 --> 00:01:02.970
Vitz is a senior scholar and one of the founding professors for the Institute for the Psychological Sciences at Divine Mercy University.

00:01:03.510 --> 00:01:07.770
He is also a professor of psychology emeritus for New York University.

00:01:08.790 --> 00:01:18.465
His work is focused on the integration of Christian theology, especially Catholic anthropology with psychology and breaks from secularism and postmodern relativism.

00:01:19.245 --> 00:01:26.545
He also addresses hatred and forgiveness, the importance of fathers, and the psychology of psychology of atheism.

00:01:27.245 --> 00:01:31.750
He has published seven books and many articles, videos, and op eds.

00:01:32.290 --> 00:01:39.830
He is currently editing a book on complementarity in men and women, which will be released in spring twenty twenty.

00:01:42.535 --> 00:01:52.955
Doctor Craig Steve Steven Titus is a professor for the Institute for the Psychological Sciences at Divine Mercy University and the director for the department of Integrative Studies.

00:01:53.335 --> 00:02:06.490
His research interest focus on virtue theory and the psychology of virtue, emotional and moral development, resilience and virtue, and the integration of psychological sciences, philosophy, and theology.

00:02:07.430 --> 00:02:18.105
He is an editor of 10 books and co editor of the Pick Cares Reader, Renewing to Mystic More Theology, which was published by Catholic University of America in 2005.

00:02:18.485 --> 00:02:22.585
He is also published by many other journal articles and book chapters.

00:02:23.210 --> 00:02:39.275
Most recently, he published the book chapter entitled, quote, virtue and resilience, Aquinas' Christian approach to virtue applied to resilience, end quote, which was published in the book called Biblical and Theological Visions of Resilience, Pastoral and Clinical Insights.

00:02:41.335 --> 00:02:41.735
Alright.

00:02:41.735 --> 00:02:45.275
And our last bio of today is doctor William j Nordlund.

00:02:45.655 --> 00:02:52.155
He is a professor and clinical supervisor for the Institute for the Psychological Sciences at Divine Mercy University.

00:02:52.870 --> 00:03:00.490
He is one of the cofounding faculty members, and for eighteen years served as chair of the department and then as academic dean.

00:03:01.350 --> 00:03:09.315
He received his PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Maryland, College Park, and he is licensed as a clinical psychologist.

00:03:10.095 --> 00:03:14.835
His areas of expertise include child, marriage, and family therapy.

00:03:15.295 --> 00:03:29.270
He is widely recognized as an expert in the area of play therapy and is coauthor of the award winning textbook, Child Centered Play Therapy, a Practical Guide to Developing Therapeutic Relationships with Children.

00:03:29.890 --> 00:03:36.015
Doctor Newling was a founding board member and served as a president of the Catholic Psychotherapy Association.

00:03:36.955 --> 00:03:43.215
He also served on the board and as president of the National Level Association for Play Therapy.

00:03:44.395 --> 00:03:47.055
So honored to have you all join us today.

00:03:48.310 --> 00:03:50.150
I'm gonna kick it on over to you all.

00:03:50.150 --> 00:03:51.670
Thank you all for attending.

00:03:51.670 --> 00:03:55.930
And, again, if you have any questions, we'll be back to you as soon as possible.

00:04:03.605 --> 00:04:04.105
Okay.

00:04:05.445 --> 00:04:06.425
Hello, everybody.

00:04:06.805 --> 00:04:09.945
Welcome to our, webinar.

00:04:10.405 --> 00:04:11.845
I wish I could see all of you.

00:04:11.845 --> 00:04:17.270
I think there are around almost 400 people who are are with us today.

00:04:18.530 --> 00:04:23.670
I'm doctor Vitz, and I'd like to start our discussion of our model.

00:04:24.690 --> 00:04:30.325
We call it a meta model, and it's a Catholic Christian meta model of the person.

00:04:30.705 --> 00:04:35.365
And what we mean by a meta model is that it's really a framework.

00:04:35.905 --> 00:04:47.090
It's not a particular theory of the personality or of psychotherapy, but it's a framework that can include all of the basic, evidence based approaches.

00:04:48.270 --> 00:04:54.290
And it includes an integration of the three great, wisdom traditions.

00:04:55.675 --> 00:05:01.535
And the three traditions which it integrates are theology, philosophy, and psychology.

00:05:02.315 --> 00:05:06.415
And along with psychology, most of what is called mental health practice.

00:05:08.330 --> 00:05:12.190
And it's very important to understand that what we're doing here is this.

00:05:13.530 --> 00:05:21.550
Existing approaches to, psychotherapy and counseling have usually been rather narrowly focused.

00:05:22.575 --> 00:05:42.290
And even when they were somewhat broader than usual or involved combining different approaches, they almost always ignored the philosophical assumptions which were present in in in those psychologies, and above all, the implicit moral or theological meaning of their approaches.

00:05:42.910 --> 00:06:11.340
And what we're doing by explicitly bringing in theology and philosophy along with psychology is to expand the notion of the person so that other frameworks, even if they don't agree with us, which is perfectly okay, will be challenged to introduce their theological or moral aspects, and to introduce their philosophical assumptions so that we can see from what more general framework they're operating.

00:06:12.040 --> 00:06:17.100
But our general framework, which includes these three wisdom traditions, is very clear.

00:06:19.205 --> 00:06:25.785
Now it's important to remember that it took a long time for this model to develop, and the three of us are editors.

00:06:27.045 --> 00:06:30.585
We've all contributed to the model, but so have many other people.

00:06:30.645 --> 00:06:36.140
It's taken roughly twenty years, even a little more for the development of this model.

00:06:36.140 --> 00:06:39.660
This involves scholars from many disciplines.

00:06:39.660 --> 00:06:41.360
We've used case histories.

00:06:41.420 --> 00:06:47.440
We've had student and faculty research, impact us and help us to develop these ideas.

00:06:48.275 --> 00:06:55.335
So as I said, this is a framework, a meta model for use with existing evidence based mental health theory and practice.

00:06:55.955 --> 00:07:00.055
We're not a critic we're not a criticism of existing theories.

00:07:00.570 --> 00:07:05.150
We're just an attempt to integrate them and to expand their understanding of the person.

00:07:06.170 --> 00:07:12.270
And as long as there's evidence to support the clinical theory that's in question, we're fine with it.

00:07:13.625 --> 00:07:15.485
I think we're ready for the next slide.

00:07:18.105 --> 00:07:25.005
As I said, the three wisdom traditions are, philosophy, theology, philosophy, and psychology.

00:07:25.770 --> 00:07:30.110
And psychology includes not just theoretical psychology or even psychotherapy.

00:07:30.330 --> 00:07:33.230
It includes mental health practice in general.

00:07:34.810 --> 00:07:41.055
Now this model, for short, we call it either the meta model or the CCMMP.

00:07:42.315 --> 00:07:49.435
And it gives a specific definition of the person for each of those three, wisdom traditions.

00:07:49.435 --> 00:07:56.940
So it gives the definition of the person from a theological perspective, from a philosophical perspective, and from a psychological perspective.

00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:04.700
And that means that we have a hierarchical integration of our knowledge of the person or representation of them.

00:08:06.440 --> 00:08:10.195
Okay, we can go on, I think, to those three.

00:08:10.575 --> 00:08:11.635
Here we are.

00:08:12.495 --> 00:08:29.770
As a psychological definition of the person, from our perspective of psychology, the human person is an embodied individual who is intelligent, uses language, and exercises a limited but significant amount of free will.

00:08:31.190 --> 00:08:51.980
The person is fundamentally interpersonal that is created from relationships with others, is fundamentally interpersonal, experiences and expresses emotions, and has sensory perceptual cognitive cognitive capacities, which allow the person to be in contact with reality.

00:08:53.480 --> 00:09:07.395
All of these characteristics are possible because of the unity of the body and human unique self consciousness, which are both expressed, which are all expressed in behavior and in our mental life.

00:09:08.815 --> 00:09:09.315
Okay?

00:09:10.735 --> 00:09:11.235
Next.

00:09:14.100 --> 00:09:17.880
To continue the definition of the person from a psychological perspective.

00:09:18.740 --> 00:09:40.115
Furthermore, and this is important because it's part of the meta model in a in a contributive and new way, the person is called by human nature to flourishing through virtuous behavior and transcendent growth, through interpersonal commitments to family, friends, and others, and through work, service, and meaningful leisure.

00:09:41.790 --> 00:09:49.330
From their origins, both natural and transcendent, all persons have intrinsic goodness, dignity, and worth.

00:09:50.030 --> 00:09:50.990
That's very important.

00:09:50.990 --> 00:09:52.430
We want to underline that.

00:09:52.430 --> 00:09:58.305
All persons have intrinsic goodness, dignity, and worth, no matter what you might think.

00:09:59.245 --> 00:10:03.825
Even a serial killer has intrinsic goodness, dignity, and worth.

00:10:05.165 --> 00:10:11.990
In the course of life, however, through suffering from many natural, personal, and social disorders and other conditions.

00:10:12.930 --> 00:10:18.470
Persons hope for healing, they hope for meaning, and they hope for flourishing.

00:10:21.010 --> 00:10:23.910
Okay, you know, on next, I think.

00:10:24.285 --> 00:10:28.225
We've summarized the psychological definition of the person.

00:10:30.125 --> 00:10:53.960
From a philosophical perspective, the human person is an individual substance of irrational, that is intellectual, volitional, free, relational, interpersonal, sensory, perceptual, cognitive, that's pre rational knowledge, emotional, and unified body soul nature.

00:10:55.325 --> 00:11:10.950
The person is called to flourishing, moral responsibility, and virtue through his or her vowed or non vowed vocational state, as well as through life work, service to others, and meaningful leisure.

00:11:12.690 --> 00:11:14.790
So there's our philosophical definition.

00:11:17.410 --> 00:11:19.590
And now we go to the theological.

00:11:21.885 --> 00:11:42.960
From a theological perspective, that is, from the perspective of Scripture, tradition of the church and the faith, and of the Catholic Magisterium, from a theological perspective, the human person is created in the image of God and made by and for divine and human love.

00:11:44.220 --> 00:12:00.690
And although suffering, the effects of original personal and social sin, the person is invited to divine redemption in Christ Jesus, sanctification through the Holy Spirit, and beatitude with God the Father.

00:12:01.950 --> 00:12:05.170
So there's our theological definition of the person.

00:12:05.470 --> 00:12:13.525
And it's from the fact that we are created in the image of God, that we have intrinsic goodness and dignity.

00:12:13.825 --> 00:12:20.405
And that's characteristic of all all persons because they are all created in the image of God.

00:12:23.600 --> 00:12:35.460
I think then I've covered the basic, three divine, three wisdom traditions, the divine, the philosophical, and the psychological.

00:12:36.465 --> 00:12:45.925
And it's what I want to summarize now is that these three wisdom traditions are integrated in a hierarchical form.

00:12:46.625 --> 00:12:59.210
You can operate at only one of them if you wish, and or as a Catholic or Christian psychologist would, you can operate from all three of them at the same time.

00:13:00.230 --> 00:13:14.905
But by integrating them, we have enlarged the notion of the person to include the philosophical aspects which all psychological approaches contain, but which have almost never been spelled out.

00:13:15.205 --> 00:13:18.025
And we also have the theological aspect.

00:13:18.790 --> 00:13:29.690
Now that is not found in normal psychology as theology, but it is found in in normal psychology as a kind of moral tradition or a moral goal.

00:13:30.470 --> 00:13:39.675
For example, we argue that the person is redeemed and that redemption is Christian.

00:13:40.535 --> 00:13:48.555
But there can be other kinds of redemption and in psychological sense, for example, the redemption has been proposed many times.

00:13:49.670 --> 00:13:52.970
Jung proposed self realization as redemption.

00:13:55.270 --> 00:14:00.810
Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow proposed self actualization as a form of redemption.

00:14:01.935 --> 00:14:09.715
And now some of the positive psychologists are proposing human flourishing through the virtues as a kind of redemption.

00:14:10.575 --> 00:14:20.920
So what we're saying is that although we have the Christian understanding of redemption, the others have their own aspect of redemption as well.

00:14:21.140 --> 00:14:33.415
And so we're at we're challenging them to enlarge their own representation of the person to include those aspects which we have included in ours.

00:14:36.355 --> 00:14:46.330
I think I've covered about what is my, my introduction as far as I remember.

00:14:47.910 --> 00:14:55.035
So we have, we move to now the faith based premises, and I'll just summarize them for you briefly.

00:14:55.415 --> 00:15:00.315
The human person is created in the image of God, is fallen and weakened.

00:15:01.255 --> 00:15:11.850
I expect those two theological positions would be fairly close to Judaism and probably in some ways even Islam and other religions as well.

00:15:12.310 --> 00:15:15.850
And we're offered redemption and beatitude in a Christian way.

00:15:16.150 --> 00:15:26.655
They may be offered in different ways or other religions or even in a secular sense, as I've said, through self realization or flourishing of of the virtues.

00:15:27.675 --> 00:15:31.295
But those are our first three premises of the meta model.

00:15:32.310 --> 00:15:32.550
Good.

00:15:32.550 --> 00:15:34.650
Premises one, two, and three.

00:15:34.710 --> 00:15:38.250
Created, fallen, redeemed.

00:15:39.190 --> 00:15:39.670
Good, Paul.

00:15:39.670 --> 00:15:40.570
Can you hear me?

00:15:40.870 --> 00:15:44.970
I can hear you, Craig, and I think it's I pass the baton to you.

00:15:45.175 --> 00:15:46.135
Well, thank you very much.

00:15:46.135 --> 00:15:49.915
You've done a very fine job of helping us get to this point of looking at the premises.

00:15:50.695 --> 00:15:59.835
And, what we're gonna do is take a very, if you will, short look at the premises that in that expand upon the definitions which are foundational for its understanding.

00:16:00.460 --> 00:16:05.040
And we'll we'll talk quickly here about, the premises that are 11 in number.

00:16:05.340 --> 00:16:13.200
And in order to give some of the more meat and potatoes of the understanding of what the how the person has conceptualized and thrives.

00:16:13.525 --> 00:16:24.185
Then we'll move on afterwards to doctor Nordling, who will present a case, that will bring, psych the psychological implications of the meta model to the fore in a much stronger sense.

00:16:24.725 --> 00:16:38.550
And so as doctor, Vitz said, the 11 premises that, oversee the areas identified within the definition, can be understood in in a num numerous ways.

00:16:38.550 --> 00:16:42.570
But one way is to see first the faith based premises, which are three in number.

00:16:43.805 --> 00:16:59.740
As Octavit said, the first theological premise is that, everyone, each human person is created in the image of God, made in love and for self giving love, called to friendship, communion, and flourishing.

00:17:00.360 --> 00:17:03.880
We're created for purpose, the purpose of loving and serving God.

00:17:03.880 --> 00:17:11.180
We're created to love our neighbors as ourselves, as stewards of creation, and to work for goodness and holiness, justice, and peace.

00:17:11.695 --> 00:17:16.035
What are the implications of affirming that we are created in the image and likeness of god?

00:17:16.655 --> 00:17:39.410
Well, from the meta model perspective, it this the implications are that it provides this this premise provides a faith based acknowledgment that even in the face of unhealthy values or poor choices and disordered behavior of your clients, each of them possesses an indelible dignity and goodness, and each of your clients is called to a transcendent flourishing.

00:17:40.295 --> 00:17:47.595
This premise affirms that your clients are loved by God and that you are called to serve them, on their life journey.

00:17:48.695 --> 00:17:59.650
The second, That gives you an over overview of that first, premise of the person being created in the image of God.

00:18:00.110 --> 00:18:03.090
There's sub premises that that are, very expansive.

00:18:04.030 --> 00:18:10.255
The the meta model of the person volume the Catholic Christian meta model of the person volume is 736 pages.

00:18:10.715 --> 00:18:18.495
So here what we're doing is greatly condensing and focusing on the premise mentioning simply identifying your sub premises.

00:18:19.690 --> 00:18:24.830
But the the second faith based premise is that the human race is is fallen.

00:18:27.130 --> 00:18:36.265
And, because of that suffers the influence of moral and spiritual brokenness, and in particular, where we can do to a prideful alienation from God.

00:18:36.805 --> 00:18:46.425
This brokenness is documented in the tendencies to greed, self serving biases, narcissism, wrath, injustice, and so on.

00:18:47.010 --> 00:18:54.530
Although there are there is a continual struggle with evil, humans, nonetheless, are still basically good and retain basic dignity.

00:18:54.530 --> 00:18:56.950
This is a clear and important Catholic principle.

00:18:58.690 --> 00:19:08.525
They are still made in God's image and likeness even after the fall and retain basic tendencies to self preservation, goodness, truth, family, and beauty.

00:19:09.065 --> 00:19:16.340
What are the implications of affirming that humans are influenced by the consequences of sin yet still fundamentally good?

00:19:16.560 --> 00:19:19.620
Well, the benefit is that you have reason to hope.

00:19:20.240 --> 00:19:29.700
In the midst of needing to face suffering and limitations, hope is possible due to the to the promise of redemption, the next premise.

00:19:30.235 --> 00:19:42.815
But it is also due to the deep conviction that each human's in embodiment of and participation in goodness by a gift of god is more fundamental than any evil they may embody, express, or encounter.

00:19:43.710 --> 00:19:57.410
So for the helping professional and the mental health professional, this premise is the basis for aiming not only at changing behavior, but also changing hearts to align them with the deepest longings, the human longings for goodness and relationship.

00:20:00.615 --> 00:20:07.275
The third theological, premise is that the person is invited to redemption and beatitude.

00:20:07.895 --> 00:20:15.330
There's a transcendent ground for hope and charity because God offers human beings redemption and promises eternal beatitude.

00:20:16.190 --> 00:20:23.010
Humans are offered redemption, the overcoming of brokenness and sin through God's own mercy and love and grace.

00:20:24.110 --> 00:20:33.055
The human inclination for more and for ultimate flourishing is answered by God's everyday and ultimate generosity, forgiveness, and communion.

00:20:33.915 --> 00:20:36.975
What are the implications of this premise of redemption?

00:20:37.995 --> 00:20:43.535
Well, the desire for ultimate wholeness, the desire for redemption can be found in all people.

00:20:44.130 --> 00:20:54.790
The level of redemption offers responses to mental challenges and disorders through the effects of forgiveness, commitment, responsibility, and freedom, and so on.

00:20:55.410 --> 00:21:01.405
Complete physical and mental wellness or lack of negative influences is not often possible.

00:21:01.865 --> 00:21:25.475
However, inevitable suffering and sacrifice can take on new meaning when clients enter more fully into god's love, the therapist's care, the reawakening of vocational commitments to family and friend, and service to those in need, helping professionals and mental health practitioners can be beacons of hope, love, and faith.

00:21:29.215 --> 00:21:32.335
Those are the three philosophic I'm sorry.

00:21:32.335 --> 00:21:34.515
Those are the three theological premises.

00:21:35.215 --> 00:21:40.130
Now there I'd like to present the eight philosophical premises.

00:21:41.950 --> 00:21:50.450
They are eight in number and, they are from a different perspective, a different foundation of than the fills than the faith based premises.

00:21:51.435 --> 00:22:05.455
Nonetheless, they also account for the wholeness of the person and its vocations, its aims, the person's goals, and the basic capacities that are connective, relational, dynamic, and directed towards flourishing in this world and the next.

00:22:08.200 --> 00:22:11.900
So what are we what we're doing, we counted three theological premises.

00:22:11.960 --> 00:22:12.600
There's eight more.

00:22:12.600 --> 00:22:14.200
So I'm gonna pick up the count here.

00:22:14.200 --> 00:22:18.700
And so the first philosophical premise is the fourth overall premise.

00:22:19.480 --> 00:22:32.305
And this fourth premise, involves each person being, a whole, a whole that is called to a greater wholeness as, as such, as a personal unity.

00:22:32.605 --> 00:22:40.660
Each person, both male and female, has a personal dignity, moral value, and spiritual goodness from a philosophical perspective too.

00:22:41.520 --> 00:22:46.580
Males and females have equal worth, different gifts, and complimentary and complimentary missions.

00:22:47.555 --> 00:22:50.855
We all are spiritual body soul unities.

00:22:52.595 --> 00:22:57.335
What affects the body affects the soul, and, of course, what affects the soul affects the body in this perspective.

00:22:57.795 --> 00:23:02.400
What are the implications of affirming that a person is a whole, seeking greater wholeness?

00:23:03.340 --> 00:23:08.640
Well, this principle helps to identify the personal wholeness and identity of each client.

00:23:08.940 --> 00:23:24.905
In particular, invites mental health professional to become aware of the strengths and struggles that come from partaking in, the diverse gifts, cultures, religious practices, spiritualities, and family histories that shape the lives of each of your clients.

00:23:25.605 --> 00:23:31.625
The affirmation of being a whole person also adds a dimension of ethical norms, including professional norms.

00:23:32.900 --> 00:23:39.080
The dignity of the person is, the basis to respect life from conception until death.

00:23:39.300 --> 00:23:46.440
It is the basis to protect both the profession helping professionals and the client's conscience and sense of responsibility.

00:23:49.215 --> 00:23:55.475
The fifth premise is that, the human person is fulfilled through vocation.

00:23:56.735 --> 00:24:19.735
There are three interrelated types of calling or vocation, each contributing to everyday and and ultimate flourishing, each starting with some kind of good that attracts us, response that, is a call, is accepting of the goodness, seeking of the goodness, and the transformation that happens because of it, because of the response to the good call.

00:24:20.115 --> 00:24:27.575
There are three interrelated types of of calling or vocation, each contributing to everyday or ultimate flourishing.

00:24:28.275 --> 00:24:31.895
The first type of vocation is that each person is called to goodness.

00:24:32.580 --> 00:24:36.600
Justice, truth, holiness, relationship, and beauty, each in a unique way.

00:24:37.300 --> 00:24:45.880
The second type of vocation is that each person is called to honor their vocational relationships, be they single, married, family, consecrated, or ordained.

00:24:46.815 --> 00:24:56.675
And the third aspect or level or type of vocation is that each person is called to self giving work, devoted service, and, meaningful leisure.

00:24:57.455 --> 00:25:01.875
What are the implications of having three types of vocational, calling?

00:25:02.550 --> 00:25:08.330
Well, vocational perspective requires a developmental, personal, and spiritual life narrative.

00:25:09.110 --> 00:25:16.250
The life journey with its purposes, meanings, and missions starts with the gift of life and is called forward and grows in responses.

00:25:17.030 --> 00:25:43.250
For example, it adds the the fuller notion of understanding trauma and its treatment, which becomes, contextualized when we understand that a trauma impacts a person's vocational relationships as when as a wife, to her husband, or as a mother to her children, as a colleague at work, and in one's life of prayer.

00:25:44.670 --> 00:25:50.835
The connection of life events with one's vocations is of utmost importance in the meta model.

00:25:51.455 --> 00:25:58.435
The sixth premise is that the human person is fulfilled in virtue, which is closely related to vocations.

00:25:59.855 --> 00:26:10.330
A dynamic view of the person requires a dynamic view of the person's strengths and weaknesses, virtues, and vices, as well as moral character, spiritual maturity, and or lack or lack thereof.

00:26:11.110 --> 00:26:26.465
The term virtue, as we know, is often misunderstood more than our particular virtues, which are the basis of relationships and flourishing, and more tangible often, for example, in terms of virtue of love, hope, patience, moderation, courage, forgiveness, and so on.

00:26:26.845 --> 00:26:33.230
The virtues involve the functioning of human capacities, the varsity of relationships, and the attainment of goals?

00:26:33.930 --> 00:26:40.590
What are the implications of, the the person flourishing in virtue for the helping professional?

00:26:41.530 --> 00:26:54.285
Well, even without using the term virtue, the helping professional offers models and practices that promote virtues and strengths, hope, moderation, perseverance, practical wisdom, and so on.

00:26:55.625 --> 00:27:00.050
The seventh premise is that humans are interpersonally relational.

00:27:01.790 --> 00:27:07.490
From conception, human persons are fundamentally relational and do not exist in isolation or not for long.

00:27:08.190 --> 00:27:17.335
Moreover, there is a relational and even spousal meaning to the body and to human emotional, rational, and volitional capacities.

00:27:18.195 --> 00:27:29.800
The family is a basic unit of society, as important as the individual is, and we need to continue to reinforce that fact, each person finds its origin in the family, which has its roles.

00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:36.040
For example, the parents having the role of being primary educators of their children, even when the family is blended or broken.

00:27:39.345 --> 00:27:45.045
What what is the implication of acknowledging the importance of interpersonal relationality in helping professions?

00:27:45.745 --> 00:27:51.925
Well, interpersonal relationships are resources for growth and healing as is the family.

00:27:52.320 --> 00:28:07.245
Not only do parents normally serve as the basis for secure attachments and as a safe base in the midst of challenges, but other people, including helping professionals, can serve as a safe haven and can facilitate corrective emotional experiences.

00:28:08.025 --> 00:28:13.565
Systemic and relational therapies offer complimentary insights on the importance of family, friends, and colleagues.

00:28:14.025 --> 00:28:23.080
And transcendent perspectives recognize the influence and inter that an intentional relationship with God in prayer, love, and service can bring.

00:28:25.860 --> 00:28:30.280
The eighth premise is that the human person is sensory, perceptual, cognitive.

00:28:30.820 --> 00:28:39.435
Here we're entering into four, premises that are anthropological, a basic structure for understanding the knowing and loving that a person is capable of.

00:28:40.935 --> 00:28:47.915
In in this eighth premise, our bodies are recognized as fully personal and our persons as fully embodied.

00:28:48.580 --> 00:28:59.800
This affirmation holds in a nonexclusive way for the capacities of sensation and perception that enable persons to take interest in and interact with other people and the world.

00:29:00.685 --> 00:29:08.545
These capacities are the basis for human re receptivity, and in turn, they comprise the first instincts and inclinations.

00:29:08.925 --> 00:29:16.590
And for example, they include pre rational cognitions of what is friendly or hostile and what is attractive or repulsive.

00:29:17.690 --> 00:29:23.870
What are the implications of recognizing the person being sensory as being sensory, perceptual, and cognitive?

00:29:24.570 --> 00:29:29.390
Well, this person is normally in contact with the world and other persons with their senses and perceptions.

00:29:30.535 --> 00:29:46.900
When there are difficulties or obstructions in reading the world for biochemical and neurological reasons, for example, individuals may suffer unintentional isolation and disorientation and the need for the intervention of a helping professional and so on.

00:29:47.440 --> 00:29:50.660
The ninth premise is that the person is emotional.

00:29:51.920 --> 00:30:01.695
Human persons, are emotional both in common and unique ways because of the person's spiritual body, soul unity.

00:30:02.635 --> 00:30:08.255
Emotional diversity is rooted in factors such as culture, personal experience, masculinity, and femininity.

00:30:09.530 --> 00:30:12.270
What are the implications of affirming that the person is emotional?

00:30:12.890 --> 00:30:22.670
Well, the helping professional will learn a great deal by recognizing how clients experience and moderate their effects in personal and unique ways.

00:30:23.325 --> 00:30:30.225
Emotions influence one's intellectual, moral, and spiritual interactions and interpersonal relationships.

00:30:31.085 --> 00:30:37.265
For example, feeling anxious can affect the way that the client interacts with his spouse and children.

00:30:38.080 --> 00:30:45.040
Conversely, emotions are influenced by one's reason and will as well as one's interpersonal relationships and spiritual life.

00:30:45.040 --> 00:30:57.815
For example, a client's cognitive capacities to face dangers, motivations, to focus on goals, and secure interpersonal attachments can serve in calming anxiety raised in a threatening situation.

00:31:00.195 --> 00:31:05.175
A tenth premise, the person, human person is rational.

00:31:06.510 --> 00:31:19.090
Humans are pre rational, and they have pre rational and rational cognitions to know and understand, people, to make sense of the world around us, and to appreciate wisdom and beauty.

00:31:19.655 --> 00:31:21.895
We're not enclosing ourselves with our thoughts.

00:31:21.895 --> 00:31:24.455
Rather, we think about other people in the world around us.

00:31:24.455 --> 00:31:26.555
We plan plans and we achieve goals.

00:31:27.095 --> 00:31:27.835
We're rational.

00:31:28.775 --> 00:31:32.235
What are the implications of appreciating the rationality of the human person?

00:31:33.050 --> 00:31:39.230
Reason can help people to understand life as it really is, which is a goal of good mental health.

00:31:39.770 --> 00:31:46.190
On the contrary, distorted cognitions about life may be a sign or result of poor mental health.

00:31:46.935 --> 00:32:07.150
The cognitive and neo the cognitive and neurosciences have become very powerful tools for understanding the person, but they need to be integrated into the larger frame of the person, family, community in search for counsel, understanding, and wisdom as is, the framework offered by this, the meta model.

00:32:08.090 --> 00:32:15.710
Lastly, the eleventh premise, is that humans are volitional and free.

00:32:16.225 --> 00:32:20.145
To a large degree, we are capable of free and responsible action in the world.

00:32:20.145 --> 00:32:25.685
Because we have freedom to choose, we can be considered moral moral agents.

00:32:26.465 --> 00:32:30.565
What are the implications of an integrated vision of volition and freedom?

00:32:31.230 --> 00:32:40.370
Well, growth and healing inevitably requires the choice to move freely towards proper goals of life that is towards true flourishing.

00:32:40.910 --> 00:32:46.605
Because we are free and have rational capacity, we can contribute to our own healing and to flourishing.

00:32:47.465 --> 00:32:57.005
The capacity for freely choosing goals gives hope for change, change that can correct the past, engage the present, and approach the future.

00:32:58.310 --> 00:33:05.530
There you have a very quick overview of the 11 premises of the meta model with certain insights into its application.

00:33:06.070 --> 00:33:18.425
Now doctor Nordling will engage us in analysis of the benefits of the meta model for the field of psychology and mental health practice with an, illustrated case vignette on the side.

00:33:18.425 --> 00:33:19.165
Doctor Nordling.

00:33:19.785 --> 00:33:20.025
Good.

00:33:20.025 --> 00:33:21.245
Thank you, Doctor Titus.

00:33:21.865 --> 00:33:34.470
And so, now we're at the time where we're gonna kinda look at, okay, what difference does the meta model make for the field of psychology and for mental health practice?

00:33:35.170 --> 00:33:39.030
And so, if you can put the slide on on the four benefits.

00:33:44.175 --> 00:33:44.495
Okay.

00:33:44.495 --> 00:33:51.555
So there are there are four major benefits that the meta model offers, the field of psychology.

00:33:51.855 --> 00:34:00.090
First of all, as as it's been talked about, it provides an enriched vision of the person, marriage, family, and society.

00:34:00.870 --> 00:34:12.490
And specifically, a vision of the person that, augments the often isolated, versions of the person that exist within different models.

00:34:12.550 --> 00:34:17.705
For example, it's not that the cognitive sciences are bad.

00:34:17.705 --> 00:34:22.605
They give us a great deal of information about, the person as rational.

00:34:23.545 --> 00:34:31.220
Interpersonal theory gives us a lot of information about the relational aspects, of the person.

00:34:31.760 --> 00:34:39.620
And, the dynamic perspectives gives us a a real good understanding of the interior life of the person.

00:34:39.680 --> 00:34:46.195
And so what the meta model does is it says we we need to be multiperspectival.

00:34:46.975 --> 00:35:08.880
We need to adopt multiple theoretical positions in order to truly get a good idea of what the person is, And ultimately, this is gonna contribute to the second benefit, which it promotes an enriched approach to diagnosis, to case formulation, and ultimately, what we do.

00:35:09.515 --> 00:35:19.615
For example, if we have a case of a depressed person, the depressed the depression itself tells us a a lot about the emotional aspect of the client.

00:35:19.995 --> 00:35:42.305
However, when we find out that this client also has marital distress, distress, which is at the vocational level, in the sense that in their most deeply held committed relationships, there's distress, there's dysfunction, then we know that if we were to simply remove the depression, we would not have a flourishing person.

00:35:42.365 --> 00:35:46.225
We still need to address the vocational level.

00:35:46.365 --> 00:36:17.655
And so the CCMMP framework, in some ways, is a safeguard for the clinician to make sure that, in some ways, we go down the checklist, and we make sure that we have all of the information that gives us the big picture and that we're not too quickly, reducing our vision either because of our own individual preferred models or because of our specializations, or because of a diagnosis.

00:36:18.115 --> 00:36:24.055
One of the things the metamodel is clear about, is that, a person is not a diagnosis.

00:36:24.850 --> 00:36:30.550
Diagnoses, or is not a a person is not a mental disorder.

00:36:30.930 --> 00:36:38.630
They may, have different types of problems, and these problems impact the whole person.

00:36:39.090 --> 00:36:46.385
And so the second thing about the CCMNP framework is that it it enriches our approach to diagnosis.

00:36:46.525 --> 00:36:58.030
So we're no longer just interested in, say, a DSM five diagnosis, but we're also trying to look at the strengths and the challenges of the client.

00:36:58.170 --> 00:37:01.870
You know, do they have strengths in the interpersonal level?

00:37:02.250 --> 00:37:06.670
Do, how is their if they're married, how is their marriage?

00:37:07.770 --> 00:37:17.245
How are the parents contributing, and being able to be good co parents, how what is the value system?

00:37:17.245 --> 00:37:22.890
What what values does this person hold and do they find themselves living within that value system?

00:37:23.770 --> 00:37:30.030
Do they have meaningful work, that contributes to a sense of meaning for them in their life?

00:37:30.410 --> 00:37:35.950
So we go way beyond just the standard, psychological disorders.

00:37:36.250 --> 00:37:42.465
Number three, the meta model facilitates clients' care that is personalized.

00:37:44.285 --> 00:37:53.330
Often when we look at broad kinds of generalizations like depression, we have evidence based practice that addresses depression.

00:37:54.110 --> 00:37:54.990
And that's good.

00:37:54.990 --> 00:37:59.570
There's we we don't want to we wanna have things that work for, say, depression.

00:38:00.110 --> 00:38:07.515
However, when we look at the meta model, we personalize our understanding.

00:38:07.975 --> 00:38:11.515
We we learn about this the important vocational callings.

00:38:11.975 --> 00:38:13.335
We learn about the marriage.

00:38:13.335 --> 00:38:16.935
We learn about their, their goals in life.

00:38:16.935 --> 00:38:19.275
We learn about their values.

00:38:19.480 --> 00:38:31.100
And we help to make sure that in our treatment, we're helping them to accomplish and be fulfilled in those kinds of, goals and be fulfilled and to flourish.

00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:39.945
Finally, the meta model allows us to understand their own vocational calling.

00:38:39.945 --> 00:38:45.865
In other words, the meta model is not simply, something we apply to our clients.

00:38:45.865 --> 00:39:01.705
It's the way that we help on this on this earth.

00:39:01.705 --> 00:39:09.245
And so it goes beyond being simply a profession, to being a vocational calling.

00:39:09.785 --> 00:39:25.460
And with that understanding of myself, as a Christian, that means I also need to be able to bring that Christian identity and the Christian worldview in into the way that I understand people.

00:39:26.145 --> 00:39:56.510
And but it's got to be, of course, balanced with also respecting and not only balanced, but respectful of and, absolutely in line with being able to respect the client's world view, to be aware of their dignity, to always, have clients being able to act in conscience, and having clients, of course, the right to determine therapeutic goals.

00:39:56.510 --> 00:39:58.245
And so there's a there's a balance.

00:39:58.245 --> 00:40:02.505
We could have a whole, webinar on how you accomplish that balance.

00:40:03.045 --> 00:40:10.665
One way of describing it is that the meta model says there are two complete persons involved in a therapeutic intervention.

00:40:10.965 --> 00:40:12.825
More, of course, if you have a couple.

00:40:13.230 --> 00:40:20.850
But two fully human beings interacting with one of them helping, the other person to fully flourish.

00:40:21.790 --> 00:40:22.610
Next slide.

00:40:24.270 --> 00:40:33.395
And so, much of much of what we've talked about so far, can seem a little bit abstract.

00:40:33.455 --> 00:40:38.595
And so what I wanna do is is to talk a little bit about a case.

00:40:38.895 --> 00:40:43.100
Now we're not gonna be able to look at a case in-depth.

00:40:44.360 --> 00:40:54.300
To look at a case from the Meta Model perspective probably would talk would take probably about an hour to do a a really nice job, and I've only have about five more minutes left.

00:40:54.600 --> 00:41:07.285
So, I wanna let you know that ahead of time, but I do wanna begin to look at a case as a way of kind of concretely illustrating, why the meta model, adds some value.

00:41:07.285 --> 00:41:18.920
And so we're gonna look at the meta model, and the first thing to recognize, the meta model framework places demands on a clinician to use multiple filters or levels of analysis.

00:41:19.700 --> 00:41:24.795
Many of these levels of analysis are utilized in traditional approaches to clinical work.

00:41:25.495 --> 00:41:33.515
In other words, where the the meta model depends on the explanatory model that exists within the field to help it.

00:41:33.575 --> 00:41:38.530
It depends on behaviorism to understand, what shapes behavior.

00:41:38.530 --> 00:41:42.470
It learn it depends on learning theory to understand how we learn.

00:41:42.610 --> 00:41:49.830
It depends on interpersonal theory to understand how interpersonal types of things, operate.

00:41:50.450 --> 00:41:58.345
And so, but we also, also the meta model will introduce some novel things itself.

00:41:58.345 --> 00:41:59.625
So let's look at a case.

00:41:59.625 --> 00:42:01.165
So next slide.

00:42:02.345 --> 00:42:05.405
Let's look at the case of Enrique Gonzalez.

00:42:05.545 --> 00:42:06.825
He's a six year old boy.

00:42:06.825 --> 00:42:09.130
His parents have been married for ten years.

00:42:09.270 --> 00:42:11.290
His mother, Rose, is from Nicaragua.

00:42:11.670 --> 00:42:14.090
His father, Fernando, is from Mexico.

00:42:14.150 --> 00:42:22.745
The family recently relocated from Los Angeles to Baltimore, where Enrique's been enrolled in a neighborhood public school.

00:42:23.065 --> 00:42:24.585
Enrique's an only child.

00:42:24.585 --> 00:42:30.765
Enrique's mom, Rose, is seeking help because her son's having problems adjusting to the new school.

00:42:31.065 --> 00:42:41.720
He frequently refuses to go to school, and when he does, he quickly ends up in the nurse's office with complaints complaints of feeling sick, which result in him being sent home.

00:42:42.340 --> 00:42:43.160
Next slide.

00:42:44.660 --> 00:43:00.675
And so, again, if we we had, the time to thoroughly analyze this case, we could do this through, a standard DSM five diagnostic analysis, learning theory, attachment theory, interpersonal theory, positive psychology.

00:43:02.175 --> 00:43:18.925
We might very well use trauma theory if we found out, for example, that one of the parents has experienced trauma and that that's impacting, the their ability to, raise their child and certainly family systems theory.

00:43:19.385 --> 00:43:20.125
Next slide.

00:43:22.985 --> 00:43:49.005
In addition to these, kind of more traditional theories, however, the meta model would also have a heavy focus on the importance of committed relationships, the importance of meaningful work and leisure, spirituality and transcendence, a focus on positive strengths, the recognizing of one's inherent dignity, and how the person's fulfilled to the development of virtue.

00:43:49.465 --> 00:43:52.025
And so it's a very rich theory.

00:43:52.025 --> 00:43:56.425
There are a lot of filters or a lot of perspectives to look at a case.

00:43:56.425 --> 00:44:01.490
We're we'll look at it just a a a few real quickly, and then we'll be stopping for questions.

00:44:02.350 --> 00:44:03.170
Next slide.

00:44:05.550 --> 00:44:15.565
So, you know, the basic understanding that we would need to look at is what is the what is the diagnosis from a DSM five perspective?

00:44:16.745 --> 00:44:31.220
Too much reliance on a symptom based understanding of the case might result in us as diagnosing Enrique as having an anxiety disorder, specifically separation anxiety and ultimately, accompanied by school refusal.

00:44:32.560 --> 00:44:53.585
If we stayed at that level, we might limit ourselves to either a pharmacological or medication approach, such as to relieve anxiety through medication, or perhaps, focus exclusively on his school refusal behavior, and, focus on a behavioral approach to increase school attendance.

00:44:54.125 --> 00:45:11.800
Both of these may be very well appropriate, but they still represent a two reductionistic set of filters, because if we look at Enrique through other dimensions of the meta model, we we learn information that's very important towards treatment.

00:45:12.500 --> 00:45:13.400
Next slide.

00:45:15.885 --> 00:45:24.285
So for example, if we look at the dyadic or interpersonal level, we might see some very valuable information added.

00:45:24.285 --> 00:45:34.140
For example, it would be very helpful to know that Enrique has an anxious attachment style, and that this is mirrored by his mother's attachment stall.

00:45:34.140 --> 00:45:53.325
In other words, we find that Enrique's anxiety is not just his anxiety, and that it it at one level, it may be very much learned, and at another level, to truly impact, his anxiety, we may very well have to assist the mother, of Enrique in various ways.

00:45:53.545 --> 00:46:18.055
In addition, we may discover that the relationship between Enrique and his father is distant, and that the relation that some relational work between the two might produce a warmer, relationship, a supportive relationship, allow Enrique to benefit from the modeling of his father, that might help Enrique build a more secure attachment and self confidence.

00:46:18.835 --> 00:46:19.655
Next slide.

00:46:22.355 --> 00:46:32.810
And then if we were to look at the vocational level level of marriage and family, this may allow us to understand some valuable things about the marriage between mister and missus Gonzales.

00:46:32.950 --> 00:46:43.395
For example, we might find that although they love each other, which is a real strength, and they're committed to their marriage, real strength, they have significant communication problems.

00:46:43.775 --> 00:46:46.035
They have very different parenting styles.

00:46:46.095 --> 00:47:01.840
And so, they're, working at odds with with each other at times at how to help Henry, deal with this anxiety, and in some ways, how to help, Henry feel more secure, as as in terms of his attachment.

00:47:02.700 --> 00:47:03.520
Next slide.

00:47:05.975 --> 00:47:20.830
And a level that perhaps is often not as often included in standard traditional, analyses of cases, and this is the analysis of spirituality and transcendence.

00:47:21.770 --> 00:47:34.145
This may help us understand that in the past, the spirituality in connection with their faith tradition was a very important resource for Enrique, his family, and its very identity.

00:47:34.685 --> 00:47:47.460
If we inquired, we may find out that currently the family has moved across, The United States, is feeling extraordinarily isolated, from their faith community.

00:47:47.520 --> 00:47:51.220
That in the past, this faith community had provided a lot of support.

00:47:51.600 --> 00:47:57.220
It had provided lots of companionship and interaction for, say, missus Gonzales.

00:47:57.920 --> 00:48:08.975
It provided a place for the family to kinda get out of, their own kinda isolated, world and to to interact interpersonally and in communally and in friendships.

00:48:10.315 --> 00:48:20.760
The the parents may have been able to, get all kinds of support from other parents and talk with other parents about how, you know, they're handling different parenting things.

00:48:20.760 --> 00:48:27.260
And even the the church setting itself may, have have resources around parenting.

00:48:27.955 --> 00:48:54.650
And so the failure to see how important this transcendent dimension is for the family, not only at the level of social support, but in their own, taking solace and adjusting to their the challenges of their move, for, the kind of prayer life, perhaps of of praying together as a family, keeping them, interacting with each other.

00:48:54.650 --> 00:49:03.175
And these things are sometimes overlooked, the importance of them in their flourishing, but but also as resources.

00:49:04.355 --> 00:49:05.255
Final slide.

00:49:09.150 --> 00:49:09.630
Okay.

00:49:09.630 --> 00:49:25.995
Now about this time, you know, it would be unusual, for if we had a a in person web, web webinar where everyone could interact for, a number of clinicians to say, well, wait a minute.

00:49:25.995 --> 00:49:29.935
I I think there are many clinicians that do look at all of these things.

00:49:30.315 --> 00:49:49.530
And at which point, I would say, great, to the degree that as clinicians, we are able to look at the dimensions of the meta model and apply them, and and we don't overlook important aspects of the person, then and they're flourishing, then that's great.

00:49:49.590 --> 00:50:00.095
The the thing that I would observe is that sometimes, you know, because of many pressures, we aren't so good at doing that.

00:50:00.315 --> 00:50:05.280
And also, it often takes a lot of maturity as a clinician.

00:50:05.520 --> 00:50:12.340
In other words, certainly, after thirty, forty years of practicing or twenty, we learn new filters, new models.

00:50:12.400 --> 00:50:18.340
We use those models, and we look at the client through a richer, lens.

00:50:19.360 --> 00:50:29.635
However, one of the values of the meta model is that it's a safeguard that we do this in a consistent way.

00:50:30.655 --> 00:50:46.510
And in addition to that, that it allows for us to train graduate students, to be able to have this rich vision early in their careers, even during their their clients, they're seen as part of their graduate training.

00:50:46.810 --> 00:51:05.980
In other words, graduate training can be a little bit haphazard in many, graduate programs in the sense that very few, models of the of, psychotherapy are taught, very few models of dimensions of the person are focused on.

00:51:06.120 --> 00:51:26.695
The meta model allows us to to have a kind of comprehensive framework, to be able to operate, with, with clients, to be able to provide a fuller set of therapeutic interventions, and it allows us to, be able to do that early in our careers.

00:51:26.695 --> 00:51:33.355
And so that's a a big advantage of having a framework that incorporates, multiple models.

00:51:34.440 --> 00:51:55.005
And so now we're, done with the presentation part of our, webinar, and we have, as presenters, we have reviewed, clients the, questions that were sent in, and we'll try to address some of those questions.

00:51:56.025 --> 00:52:05.650
I think, doctor Bitch, you had, indicated that, you wanted to address a question that you had, seen.

00:52:06.910 --> 00:52:17.730
Well, one of the questions that I thought was interesting was, how would you summarize the basic most important takeaway from the whole webinar?

00:52:20.565 --> 00:52:24.345
In other words, not the details, but what's the the basic takeaway.

00:52:25.125 --> 00:52:39.840
What I would say is this, is that this Catholic metamodel of the person is a large framework for conceptualizing the person that enlarges our understanding of the person when we're dealing with people in psychology or in counseling.

00:52:41.180 --> 00:52:59.365
And at the same time, it's bringing in new traditions, it's bringing in theology and philosophy explicitly and challenging those who would want a different approach to develop their own philosophy and tell us what it is and their own moral framework or religious position.

00:53:00.225 --> 00:53:05.270
And in doing that we are expanding, I think, the understanding of the person.

00:53:06.290 --> 00:53:31.610
And, in this sense that's why in case you're interested, the book got an award for the expansion of reason that is for enlarging, the way we understand the term reason to include not just reductionistic or local understandings of things, in this case, reductionist or local understandings of the person.

00:53:32.230 --> 00:53:42.170
We're expanding, our understanding of the person and making it rational and therefore, understandable on a worldwide basis.

00:53:42.710 --> 00:53:47.325
So that would be my, if you can say it, my takeaway.

00:53:47.785 --> 00:53:53.405
Not exactly a sound bite, but at least a sound a sound sandwich.
